Showcase Assignment

After reading flexible learning for open education I thought it was very helpful and heartwarming to see the first discovery tool it helps recognize different ways that someone learns

One of the first points was called recognizing diversity and uniqueness and showed me that there are there is work being done on understanding the vast ways in which students/people learn! For example, in point one it states: Of the three dimensions of inclusion to design recognize diversity and unique uniqueness stresses that flexible or adaptive systems are key. Furthermore, It mentions some separate solutions are not sustainable economically or technically so just doesn’t necessarily imply that adaptive systems help the user make choices but the inclusive design will highlight the critical aspect being autonomous whilst seeking knowledge. In other words, user friendly & adaptable.

The second point around three dimensions of inclusive design where increases processing tools so this stated The dynamic of the learning resource is applicable and not discriminatory so if someone has a disability then not only does the resource not Pander to participants and treat them like tokens rather this tool is useable and only possible because it is inclusive, and accessible.

The third point is about broader beneficial impact so there’s a responsibility here that designers must understand That they have the ability to reach larger demographics, because these three dimensions support the intellectual well-being of society and encourages dynamic

I attached a figure for a visual representation of inclusive designs:

 

From the inclusive design research centre 2020

I experienced difficulty/confusion around universal design. Initially, I did not know that universal design and inclusive design were different and because universal design to me sounded like a form diverse learning amongst a multitude of backgrounds and required needs. This was not the case. As inclusive design research centre states over three main distinguishable facts about the differences between inclusive design and universal design: The Context, The User, and the Method. Universal design often times categorizes design advice according to constrained categories of disability, (IDRC, 2020). What seems apparent here is that inclusive design focuses on various forms of integrated learning whether or not one has a disability. It is adaptable.

As a side project I run community discussions for marginalized demographics. It requires active participation from those in attendance. An example of a session I facilitated was about accessibility in dance. Those communicating were individuals who experienced physical/mental/hidden barriers in dance and the arts. To make sure their messages was experienced by everyone in the room, there were two sign language interpreters, a dictation tool that projected words spoken on a big screen. As well as audio (speakers/mics), in addition to personal scribes, folks scattered around the room to help individuals take notes to pass up to the participants speaking. When I saw this topic, it made me think of my work in the community. And how quickly I learned that to be inclusive, even in a communal conversation, means that language needs to be accessible for everyone in its various forms. Currently, I am having to shift the way I run my sessions, to a virtual setting using Zoom. My personal obstacle will be creating accessibility for my community that join my Table Talk sessions.

Diversifying Learning Environments

Currently, many classes rely on a face to face format, requiring physical class attendance. Given that we are in a state of self-isolation, and social distancing, due to the current COVID-19 outbreak. This precarious time caused UVIC to move classes to an online format. What I noticed quickly is that classes that had to shift online, resorted to posting slides up with a little more detail as a response to this shift. That being said, the content changes are minimal. Which leads to dull curriculum engagement.

Some courses have become creative with their adaptations however, in terms of tests and assignments, grades have been shifted and weighted differently, these accommodations have been made because of social distancing. For example, my biology course has decided to move the final online and provide more materials online. It’s clear to me that we are not set up for sudden changes in our academic systems. What’s interesting to me, are the digital platforms and classes, that are not phased in the slightest. Distance learning allows for more adaptability, the same applies to workspaces. I was in a webinar recently, and a life coach was discussing how her format had remained, but there was an increase in clientele because folks did not know how to adjust to the changing times. My first thought this week was how major corporations have been waiting for digital shifts like these take place.

Before I pursue a masters, my first decision will be whether or not I take it online! All of this to say, our lives are changing quickly with the progression of technology and our means of communication. Never before have I had the ability to discover information, and other people around the world so seamlessly. Whether we are sharing information, entertainment, or community connection. It’s clear to me that these digital landscapes need to be as accessible as possible for all demographics. Especially within academia.

By Parker Johnson

 

References

Idrc.ocadu.ca. 2020. Inclusive Design Research Centre. [online] Available at: <https://idrc.ocadu.ca/index.php/resources/idrc-online/library-of-papers/443-whatisinclusivedesign> [Accessed 23 March 2020].

Fourth Reflection!

After reading flexible learning for open education I thought it was very helpful and heartwarming to see the first discovery tool it helps recognize different ways that someone learns

One of the first points was called recognizing diversity and uniqueness and showed me that there are there is work being done on understanding the vast ways in which students/people learn! For example, in point one it states: Of the three dimensions of inclusion to design recognize diversity and unique uniqueness stresses that flexible or adaptive systems are key. Furthermore, It mentions some separate solutions are not sustainable economically or technically so just doesn’t necessarily imply that adaptive systems help the user make choices but the inclusive design will highlight the critical aspect being autonomous whilst seeking knowledge. In other words, user friendly & adaptable.

The second point around three dimensions of inclusive design where increases processing tools so this stated The dynamic of the learning resource is applicable and not discriminatory so if someone has a disability then not only does the resource not Pander to participants and treat them like tokens rather this tool is useable and only possible because it is inclusive, and accessible.

The third point is about broader beneficial impact so there’s a responsibility here that designers must understand That they have the ability to reach larger demographics, because these three dimensions support the intellectual well-being of society and encourages dynamic

I attached a figure for a visual representation of inclusive designs:

 

From the inclusive design research centre 2020

I experienced difficulty/confusion around universal design. Initially, I did not know that universal design and inclusive design were different and because universal design to me sounded like a form diverse learning amongst a multitude of backgrounds and required needs. This was not the case. As inclusive design research centre states over three main distinguishable facts about the differences between inclusive design and universal design: The Context, The User, and the Method. Universal design often times categorizes design advice according to constrained categories of disability, (IDRC, 2020). What seems apparent here is that inclusive design focuses on various forms of integrated learning whether or not one has a disability. It is adaptable.

As a side project I run community discussions for marginalized demographics. It requires active participation from those in attendance. An example of a session I facilitated was about accessibility in dance. Those communicating were individuals who experienced physical/mental/hidden barriers in dance and the arts. To make sure their messages was experienced by everyone in the room, there were two sign language interpreters, a dictation tool that projected words spoken on a big screen. As well as audio (speakers/mics), in addition to personal scribes, folks scattered around the room to help individuals take notes to pass up to the participants speaking. When I saw this topic, it made me think of my work in the community. And how quickly I learned that to be inclusive, even in a communal conversation, means that language needs to be accessible for everyone in its various forms. Currently, I am having to shift the way I run my sessions, to a virtual setting using Zoom. My personal obstacle will be creating accessibility for my community that join my Table Talk sessions.

 I guess my question is simple, is “Universal design” outdated?

By Parker Johnson

References

Idrc.ocadu.ca. 2020. Inclusive Design Research Centre. [online] Available at: <https://idrc.ocadu.ca/index.php/resources/idrc-online/library-of-papers/443-whatisinclusivedesign> [Accessed 23 March 2020].

 

Third Post

My most memorable online learning experience has been joining page called Black Fellas on Reddit. It’s dedicated to black masculinity and culture. Although online spaces have the potential to be unsafe, this space surprised me. There were threads for moral support, updates on events, and sharing of experiences. I do not access Reddit very often but knowing that pages like this exist motivates me to seek out and access more. I was able to connect with brothers from all over, asking about similar lived experiences to mine. I also saw threads that were geared towards more vulnerable topics, held well and respectively by users of the page. Substitution is used in place of text when folks can post up videos, or audio resources, memes etc. It does enhance the experience of each Reddit thread, as users inject their personality, opinions in different sometimes humorous ways. I’ve always struggled with the navigation and accessibility of Reddit, which is why I don’t use it very often. Compared to social media platforms I use daily i.e., Facebook or Instagram, that being said it feels less structured, in a way that allows users to be more open.

In terms of academia, this type of communication between students like course spaces for example, could be used better if there were more opportunities for modification and personalization. I notice that some courses ask students to interact on the course spaces blog, but unfortunately it is not very engaged, and less involved. I would argue that this leads to less engagement and motivation to interact with this type of framework. When thinking of the what, why and how a student uses an online tool, it helps when the teacher creates alternatives for students to work with. This class for example, using WordPress and annotations is very different than other courses I’ve taken in university. It is refreshing as a psychology major, I am normally assigned readings, then expected to insert my brief thoughts for a grade. The lack of customization in how I want to present my work, saps my motivation and often times reduces my interest. Whereas having the agency to create my own page, like you would on social media or a forum, and be encouraged to access my imagination and agency, is more enjoyable. As 7.4.3 Strengths and limitations of the model describes, we still need to understand how and why media and technology could be used to transform teaching in the first place. There is an opportunity to enhance online learning.

As I student, I do not know what limits course spaces has on a teachers ability to create more flexible online learning environments. But a course that showcases other avenues of learning for students, is a step in the right direction.